jEG MÅ DESVÆRRE MEDDELE AT SÅ LÆNGE ISLAM HOLDER FAST VED AT DET ER EN LOV RELIGION SOM INDEBÆRER AT SHARIALOVEN -SKAL- VÆRE LOVEN ER ISLAM HVAD KRISTENDOMMEN VAR I KORSRIDDERTIDEN, ALTSÅ EN KATASTROFE.
MVH
KRISMUHIBU

At sproget bygger på generalisering er ikke en særlig opdagelse hos Hans Hauge! Men der er sandelig forskel på, hvordan man omgås dette vilkår. Dér er brugen, sprogbrugen, vigtig. Vi ved jo godt, at det er lidt af en joke, at finner går med kniv og at amerikanere er puritanske, vi ved godt, at vi faktisk ikke kan sige "alle"men at vi ser på en tendens, som endda aldeles og vedkendt ikke har noget empirisk belæg, men netop er en lidt fiks idé (der er næppe nogen, der i ramme alvor vil mene det er særligt ofte finner bærer kniv!) - sådan er det bare overhovedet ikke med muslim-debatten! Her menes der en universel tilskrivning af en islam-essens hos disse! At kalde det et stilistik-spørgsmål er virkelig tyndt, der er rent teoretisk plat og hverken sprog-eller religionsfilosofisk eller politisk overvejet hos Hans Hauge

Hvilke retningslinjer har islams kanoniske skrifter for kønslivet? Læs på "Answering Islam":
http://www.answering-islam.org/Green/womenstatus.htm

Green:
position of women according to sharia (ahadith of Bukhari)

BEATING
Muhammad beat his wives.
... He (Muhammad) struck me (Aisha) on the chest which caused me pain ... (Muslim: book 4, number 2127)
Muhammad's companions also beat his wives and other women.
... (Umar) found the Prophet sitting sad and silent with his wives around him. ... (Umar) decided to say something which would make the Prophet laugh, so he said, "Messenger of God, I wish you had seen the daughter of Kharija when she asked me for extra money and I got up and slapped her on the neck." God's messenger laughed and said, "They are around me as you see asking for extra money." Abu Bakr then got up, went to A'isha and slapped her on the neck, and Umar did the same to Hafsa. (Mishkat Al-Masabih: volume 2, p. 690; Muslim: book 9, number 3506, Siddiqui)
Muhammad's companions beat their own wives.
Iyas b. Abdullah reported God's messenger as saying, "Do not beat God's handmaidens;" but when `Umar came to God's messenger and said, "The women have become emboldened towards their husbands," he gave licence to beat them. Then many women went round God's messenger's family complaining of their husbands, and he said, "Many women have gone around complaining of their husbands. Those are not the best among you." Abu Dawud, Ibn Majah, and Darimi transmitted it. (Mishkat Al-Masabih: volume 2, p. 692)
In the Qur'an Muhammad commanded that beating was part of the process for controlling a rebellious wife.
And those (wives) you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them. (Qur'an 4:34, Arberry)
`Umar reported the Prophet as saying, "A man will not be asked about why he beat his wife." Abu Dawud and Ibn Majah transmitted it. (Mishkat Al-Masabih: volume 2, p. 693)
A woman has the right not to be hit in the face.
Hakim b. Mu`awiya al-Qushairi quoted his father as telling that he asked, "Messenger of God, what right can any wife demand of her husband?" He replied, "That you should give her food to eat, clothe her when you clothe yourself, not strike her on the face, and do not revile her or seperate from her except in the house." Ahmad, Abu Dawud and Ibn Majah transmitted it. (Mishkat Al-Masabih: volume 2, p. 691)
The husband's right to beat his wife is Shariah law in every school of Islam.
SATISFYING THE MAN'S SEXUAL DESIRES
The Qur'an, speaking figuratively about sex, says of women:
Women are your fields: go, then, into your fields whence you please. (Qur'an 2:223, Dawood)
Muhammad gave strong warnings to women who would not accommodate their husband's or master's desire.
Talq b. `Ali reported God's messenger as saying, "When a man calls his wife to satisfy his desire she must go to him even if she is occupied at the oven." Tirmidhi transmitted it. (Mishkat Al-Masabih: volume 2, p. 691)
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet (p.) said, "if a man invites his wive to sleep with him an she refuses to come to him, then angels send their curses on her till morning." (Bukhari: volume 7, book 62, number 121, Khan).

Det pudsige omkring generalisering forekommer mig egentligt være, når man oplever, at de hårdeste kritikere generaliserer i det vi så kunne kalde modangrebet. Eksempelvist har jeg ofte bemærket, hvis jeg kritiserede bestemte handlinger eller konkret optræden fra indvandrere, (læs her Mellemøsten), så blev jeg ofte sat i bås med Fremskridtspartiet eller Dansk Folkeparti, kaldt racist eller fremmedfjendsk. Udtrykkene er ofte blevet brugt i flæng uden præcisering, meningen var alene, at nu skulle jeg bringes i en defensiv position, hvor mine udsagn om det konkrete var totalt ligegyldige.

Trist nok så er konsekvensen gennem årene blevet, at jeg har svært ved at tage sådanne kritikere seriøst. Nu opfattere jeg nærmest disse som "racister" og intolerante. Bliver mennesker sat i bås, så bliver modparten det også.